Evidence Hub

Acceptance of recommendations by a pharmacogenetics clinic

Al Alshaykh H, Cicali E, Cavallari LH, Huber JK, Williams R, Alayban G, Asiri W, Mohamed G et al.

Pharmacogenomics, 2026

201 participants

Abstract

AIM: Assess the acceptance of genotype-based pharmacist recommendations made within a pharmacogenetics (PGx) clinic.

METHODS: Patients seen by the UF Health PGx clinic between 2017 and 2022 were included in a retrospective chart review. We evaluated CYP2D6/CYP2C19 and three drug classes (opioids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs], proton pump inhibitors [PPIs]). Gene-drug pairings were classified as concordant/discordant based on pharmacist recommendations, derived from guidelines. The concordance was compared between baseline, or time that PGx results were available, at 3- and 12-months after the visit. Acceptance of recommendations was inferred by a reduction in discordant gene-drug pairs.

RESULTS: 201 patients with PGx results were seen at the clinic. There were 101 relevant prescriptions at baseline; of these 50 (50%) were discordant based on CYP2C19/CYP2D6 phenotypes. This decreased to 22 (22%); acceptance rate = 56% at 3-months (28 of 50 recommendations accepted), p-value < 0.05. At baseline, there were 28 SSRIs prescriptions, 18 (64%) were discordant versus 7 (25%) at 3-months; acceptance rate = 61%, p-value < 0.05. Of the 60 PPIs prescriptions at baseline, 25 (42%) were discordant, decreasing to 6 (10%) at 3-months; acceptance rate = 76%, p-value < 0.05.

CONCLUSION: We observed a reduction in discordant gene-drug pairs as a result of PGx pharmacist recommendations acceptance.

Gene–drug pairs Any medication that can have altered exposure, effectiveness,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 201 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free