Evidence Hub

P‐ CAB vs. PPI for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Prevention in Patients With Atherothrombotic Disease on Antithrombotic Therapy: A CDM Cohort Study

Yoon MJ, Lee S, Jung HK, Kim MH, Yu S, Jeong ES, Tae CH

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2026

2,255 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

Background: Randomised trials have suggested the benefit of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) is superior to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for ulcer recurrence in high-risk aspirin users. However, real-world comparative effectiveness across diverse antithrombotic regimens remains poorly defined.

Objective: We evaluated P-CABs versus PPIs for preventing upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in patients with acute atherothrombotic disease and using antithrombotic therapy.

Design: This retrospective cohort study utilised hospital-based Common Data Model data (2018-2024). Patients with acute cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease receiving antithrombotic therapy who initiated a PPI or P-CAB were included. Drug exposure was modelled as a time-varying variable to mitigate immortal-time bias. The primary outcome was upper GI bleeding, analysed via time-dependent Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, and concomitant medications.

Results: Among 2255 patients (PPI: 1726; P-CAB: 529) in which 53 upper GI bleeding events occurred during a median follow-up of 637 days. P-CAB use was associated with a significantly lower risk of upper GI bleeding than PPIs (incidence rate 5.7 vs. 25.8 per 1000 person-year; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.75, p = 0.016). P-CABs showed a profound reduction in moderate-to-severe upper GI bleeding (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02-0.60; p = 0.011). Notably, no bleeding events occurred in P-CAB users with high antithrombotic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 2,255 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free