A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ilaprazole (5 mg QD, 20 mg QD and 40 mg QD) and an Active Comparator, Lansoprazole (30 mg QD) on Healing of Erosive Esophagitis
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 8 weeks of daily treatment with Ilaprazole (5, 20 and 40 mg), once daily (QD), compared to lansoprazole 30 mg in healing subjects with endoscopically proven erosive esophagitis.
Conditions: Esophagitis.
Primary outcome: The crude healing rate of Erosive Esophagitis at week 4 of treatment as assessed by endoscopy..
Enrollment: 831 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 831 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Improving sleep quality leads to better mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study
- A new aging measure captures morbidity and mortality risk across diverse subpopulations from NHANES IV: A cohort study
- Fruit, vegetable, and legume intake, and cardiovascular disease and deaths in 18 countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study
- Are noise and air pollution related to the incidence of dementia? A cohort study in London, England
- Long COVID symptoms and duration in SARS-CoV-2 positive children — a nationwide cohort study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.