A Multi-centred, Phase IV, Post-Marketing, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Esomeprazole Magnesium 40mg Once Daily Versus Lansoprazole 30 mg Twice Daily in Symptom Control of Subjects With Persistent Gastrooesophageal Reflux Disease While on 30mg Once Daily Lansoprazole Therapy
Abstract
A double-blind study comparing Esomeprazole Magnesium 40 mg once daily and Lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily to control the symptoms in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with continued heartburn symptoms with a course of therapy of 30 mg twice daily Lansoprazole.
Conditions: Heartburn, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
Primary outcome: To compare the clinical efficacy of esomeprazole magnesium 40mg once daily versus lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily in symptom control of heartburn in subjects with heartburn symptoms resistant to 30 mg once daily therapy of lansoprazole..
Enrollment: 248 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 248 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Improving sleep quality leads to better mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study
- A new aging measure captures morbidity and mortality risk across diverse subpopulations from NHANES IV: A cohort study
- Fruit, vegetable, and legume intake, and cardiovascular disease and deaths in 18 countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study
- Are noise and air pollution related to the incidence of dementia? A cohort study in London, England
- Long COVID symptoms and duration in SARS-CoV-2 positive children — a nationwide cohort study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.