Evidence Hub

A Randomized Double-blind, Double Dummy, Active Comparator-controlled Dose-finding Study in Patients With Erosive Esophagitis Due to Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Los Angeles Grade C or D, and Patients With at Least Partial Symptom Response But Endoscopically Still Unhealed After 8 Weeks History of Standard Treatment Healing Course With Proton-pump Inhibitor (PPI), to Investigate Safety, Tolerability, and Healing Rates After 4 Weeks Treatment of X842 or Lansoprazole, and Symptom Pattern During Subsequent 4 Weeks Treatment With Lansoprazole

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2022

248 participants

Abstract

This study will be conducted in patients with erosive esophagitis due to gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) Los Angeles (LA) grades C or D, and in patients with at least partial symptom response but still endoscopically unhealed (LA grades A or B) after 8 weeks history of standard treatment healing course with PPI, designed to support dose selection for Phase 3 and to investigate safety, tolerability, and healing rates after 4 weeks treatment of X842 or Lansoprazole, and symptom pattern during subsequent 4 weeks treatment with Lansoprazole.

Conditions: Erosive Esophagitis.

Primary outcome: Number of Patients With Esophageal Mucosa Healing.

Enrollment: 248 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 248 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free