Evidence Hub

Proton pump inhibitors are not associated with an increased risk of Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Floria DE, Obeidat M, Váncsa S, Kávási SB, Földvári-Nagy L, Hegyi P, Veres DS, Drug VL et al.

Gut microbes, 2025

29,880 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

Observational studies reported conflicting results regarding the association between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and intestinal dysbiosis. We assessed the risk of enteric infections, including Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) among PPI users compared to non-users in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A systematic search was conducted on April 15th, 2025 (CRD42023403322). Eligible RCTs compared adults treated with PPIs versusplacebo or alternative therapies. Risk ratios (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using random effects models. Eight RCTs with 29,880 participants reported CDI rates. No significant difference was observed between PPI users and non-users (RR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.75; 1.89). Four RCTs totaling 27,254 participants compared PPIs to H2-receptor blockers, showing no significant difference in CDI risk (RR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.49; 1.07). Similarly, three RCTs (1,645 participants) comparing PPIs with potassium-competitive acid blockers found no significant difference (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.43; 3.55). The qualitative synthesis found that other enteric infections and SIBO may be more common in PPI users. Data from RCTs suggest that PPIs do not seem to increase the risk of CDI compared to placebo and other acid-suppressive medications.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 29,880 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free