Evidence Hub

Lifestyle interventions can reduce the risk of Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 62 studies involving 250,157 participants

Zhao Z, Yin Z, Zhang C

Cancer medicine, 2021

250,157 participants · 22 citations

Abstract

Background: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a well-established risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Our objective was to investigate the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions on BE risk.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to 30 September 2020. The summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the highest versus lowest categories of exposure were assessed. Analyses of subgroup, dose-response, sensitivity, and publication bias were conducted.

Results: Sixty-two studies were included that involved more than 250,157 participants and 22,608 cases. Seven lifestyle factors were investigated: smoking, alcohol, body mass index (BMI), physical activity, sleep time, medication, and diet. We observed statistically significant increased BE risks for smoking (RR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.16-1.57), alcohol intake (RR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.13-1.34), body fatness (RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.03-1.13), less sleep time (RR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.24-2.49), and proton pump inhibitors use (RR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.17-2.29). Reduced risks of BE were found for aspirin (RR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.58-0.84) and the intake of vitamin C (RR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.44-0.80), folate (RR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.31-0.71), and fiber (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.93-0.97). The quality of most included studies was high and the subgroup analysis according to the quality score showed significant results (p < 0.05). There was no publication bias for smoking and alcohol. Although the analysis suggested…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 250,157 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free