Evidence Hub

Risk of asthma in individuals with eosinophilic esophagitis: Population-based cohort study with sibling analyses

Mitselou N, Uchida A, Roelstraete B, Melén E, Garber JJ, Ludvigsson JF

Clinical and translational allergy, 2025

5,022 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction: There are limited data on the relationship between eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and asthma. We aimed to assess the risk of asthma in EoE patients compared with matched controls and siblings.

Methods: Through the ESPRESSO study, a Swedish nationwide population-based histopathology cohort, we identified EoE patients diagnosed between 1989 and 2017 (n = 1146) and up to 5 age- and sex-matched controls (n = 5022). Cox regression generated hazard ratios (HRs) for developing asthma. We compared EoE patients with sibling controls.

Results: The median age at EoE diagnosis was 42 years. During a median follow-up of 3.8 years, 140 EoE patients (28.1/1000 person-years) and 174 controls (7.2/1000 person-years) developed asthma (HR = 3.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.16-4.96, p < 0.001). An increased risk of asthma was seen in the first 10 years after EoE diagnosis but not thereafter. EoE patients diagnosed in childhood or young adulthood were at a particularly high risk of asthma (HR = 4.74; 95% CI = 2.93-7.67, p < 0.001 and HR = 5.84; 95% CI = 3.68-9.29, p < 0.001, respectively). Compared with their non-EoE siblings, EoE patients were at a 5-fold increased risk of asthma (HR = 4.97; 95% CI = 3.13-7.92, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: EoE patients are at an increased risk of asthma compared with the general population, which is unlikely to be entirely explained through unmeasured intrafamilial factors given that the positive association remained in sibling analyses.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 5,022 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free