Evidence Hub

A 20.1 kg adrenal cavernous haemangioma presenting as a giant retroperitoneal mass: diagnostic difficulties and operative strategy - a case report

Taghi A, Issa F, Alhamid A, Alayyoubi A, Atia M, Glore A, Basbous B

BMC surgery, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adrenal haemangiomas are exceptionally rare benign vascular tumours, usually discovered incidentally and measuring only a few centimetres. But in rare cases, lesions exceeding 20 kg are distinctly uncommon and pose major diagnostic and operative challenges. CASE PRESENTATION: A 67-year-old woman presented with six months of progressive abdominal distension, early satiety, and exertional dyspnea on a four years background of intermittent left loin pain. Her medical history includes HTN, T2DM, AF and heart failure. No surgical history was reported. Imaging revealed a giant left retroperitoneal mass displacing adjacent viscera. Hormonal evaluation showed hypothyroidism, consistent with a non-functional adrenal lesion. Tumour markers were negative. After multidisciplinary discussion, open trans-abdominal excision was performed. Operative time was 4 h 45 min with an estimated blood loss of 500 mL. Two units of packed red blood cells and two units of plasma were transfused pre-operatively and the same post-operatively. She underwent midline laparotomy. The tumour, densely adherent to aorta, inferior vena cava and ureter, was removed en‑bloc using meticulous dissection and a radiofrequency scissor. Concomitant umbilical hernia was repaired with a 30 × 30 cm pre‑peritoneal polypropylene underlay mesh (5 cm overlap). The excised specimen weighed 20.1 kg, verified intra-operatively. Histopathology confirmed a cavernous haemangioma without atypia or malignancy.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free