Evidence Hub

S835 Comparative Efficacy of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers, Proton Pump Inhibitors, and H2-Receptor Antagonists for Healing and Maintenance of Erosive Esophagitis: A Network Meta-Analysis of 164 Randomized Trials

Daniel M. Simadibrata, Raul Jimenez, Thai Hau Koo, Ronnie Fass

The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2025

117 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) transformed erosive esophagitis (EE) management in the 1990s, largely replacing histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) as first-line therapy. Recently, potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) emerged as a novel class of acid-suppression, offering more rapid and sustained acid inhibition, independent of food intake. Although few trials suggest superiority of vonoprazan, a PCAB, over standard-dose lansoprazole for EE healing, comparative data against high-dose or dual-delayed release PPIs remain limited. This network meta-analysis aimed to rank the healing and maintenance of EE with acid suppressants including H2RA, PPI (standard, double, dual-delayed release doses), and PCAB. Methods: Literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2, 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included if they compared acid-suppressive agents (PCAB, PPI, H2RA) in adults with endoscopically confirmed EE or previously healed EE. Primary outcomes were cumulative healing rates of EE at week 8 and maintenance rates at 6 months. A frequentist network meta-analysis determined risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), using omeprazole 20 mg once per day and placebo as reference for healing and maintenance outcomes, respectively. Treatments were ranked by P-scores. Sensitivity analyses used vonoprazan 20 mg and 10 mg once per day as alternate references for healing and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 117 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free