Evidence Hub

S436 Is the Rising Incidence of Colorectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Masking Persistent Mortality Disparities?

Silpa Choday, Anthony Yeung, Keng–Yu Chuang, Neil Vyas, Savio Charan Reddymasu

The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2025

1,234,310 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Microscopic colitis (MC) is increasing in incidence worldwide. While its etiology remains unclear, an association with various medications has been suggested, though large-scale data are limited. We aimed to determine the risk of MC in patients exposed to specific drugs within a large, multi-institutional healthcare database. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX research network. Patients aged >18 years with no prior history of MC or inflammatory bowel disease undergoing colonoscopy with biopsy were included and divided into cohorts based on exposure to drugs of interest within 3 months prior to procedure. Control cohorts comprised patients with no prior exposure to the studied drug. After crude analysis, unexposed cohorts were propensity score-matched for age, gender, race, smoking status, and alcohol use for a propensity matched analysis. Primary outcome was diagnosis of MC following procedure. Results: A total of 1,234,310 patients undergoing colonoscopy with biopsy were analyzed across the cohorts. Among major drug classes, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; RR 1.40 [1.31-1.51]) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs; RR 1.05 [1.01-1.11]) were noted to be significantly associated with increased risk of MC diagnosis. Highest risk among SSRIs was noted with sertraline (RR 1.58 [1.39-1.79]) while diclofenac was noted to have the highest risk among NSAIDs (RR 1.61 [1.41-1.84]). As a class, proton pump…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,234,310 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free