Evidence Hub

Barriers and Facilitators to The Involvement of Under-Represented Children and Young People (aged 8–25) in Mental Health Research – a Systematic Review

Rachel Perowne, S. Rowe, Azin Lajevardi, Luke Bingham, E. Parry, Gabrielle Grey, Pamela Carien Thomas, L. Gutman

Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2025

6 citations

Abstract

Young people’s involvement in mental health research enhances its relevance and impact. Involvement means conducting research with young people rather than just about them. However, under-representation persists among certain groups of young people, including ethnic minorities, those with disabilities, from lower-income households, with immigrant backgrounds and young people communicating in a language other than their first language. This systematic review applies the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) to explore barriers and facilitators to involving under-represented young people in mental health research and identify potential strategies for improvement. Five electronic databases and grey literature were systematically searched. Included studies focussed on children and young people (aged 8–25) from under-represented backgrounds involved in mental health research. The BCW was used to categorise barriers and facilitators as well as to map strategies to Intervention Functions. Five young people formed an oversight group, with three serving as co-researchers, contributing to search design, screening, data extraction and discussion. Twenty-seven studies from seven countries met the inclusion criteria. The majority of barriers and facilitators were linked to physical and social opportunity. Digital exclusion, time constraints, bureaucratic hurdles and mistrust of researchers were all barriers. Facilitators included flexible structures, inclusive communication and relationship…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free