Evidence Hub

Intracerebroventricular anaerobic dopamine in Parkinson’s disease with l-dopa-related complications: a phase 1/2 randomized-controlled trial

C. Moreau, P. Odou, J. Labreuche, Alexandre Demailly, G. Touzet, Nicolas Reyns, Bastien Gouges, A. Duhamel et al.

Nature Medicine, 2025

12 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

Continuous compensation for cerebral dopamine deficiency represents an ideal treatment for Parkinson’s disease. Dopamine does not cross the digestive and blood–brain barriers and is rapidly oxidized. The new concept is the intracerebroventricular administration of anaerobic dopamine (A-dopamine) using an abdominal pump connected to a subcutaneous catheter implanted in the third ventricle, near the striatum. An open-label phase 1 study showed no serious adverse reactions induced by A-dopamine in 12 patients. A randomized, controlled, open-label, crossover phase 2 study of 1 month of A-dopamine versus 1 month of optimized oral antiparkinsonian therapy was conducted in 9 patients. The primary endpoint, a blinded assessment of the percentage over target (that is, time with dyskinesia or bradykinesia), recorded by home actimetry using a wristwatch, was significantly reduced on A-dopamine compared with that on oral treatment alone (P = 0.027), with a median within-patient difference of −10.4 (Hedge g = −0.62 (95% confidence interval: −1.43, −0.08)). Home diaries were also significantly improved. These initial data on the feasibility, safety and effects of this new device-assisted therapy suggest validation by a large randomized double-blind trial. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04332276. A phase 1/2 clinical trial of a new device-assisted therapy in Parkinson’s disease revealed that intracerebroventricular administration of anaerobic dopamine was safe and significantly…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 12 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free