Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of Nirsevimab Immunoprophylaxis Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus-related Outcomes in Hospital Care Settings: A Seasonal Cohort Study of Infants in Catalonia, Spain

A. Perramon-Malavez, Eduardo Hermosilla, E. Coma, F. Fina, Anna Reñé, Montse Martínez-Marcos, J. Mendioroz, Clara Prats et al.

The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2025

15,341 participants · 21 citations

Abstract

Background: In Catalonia, infants <6 months old were eligible to receive nirsevimab, a novel monoclonal antibody against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). We aimed to analyze nirsevimab’s effectiveness in hospital-related outcomes of the seasonal cohort (born during the RSV epidemic from October to January 2024) and compared them with the catch-up cohort (born from April to September 2023). Methods: Retrospective cohort study of all infants born between October 1, 2023, and January 21, 2024, according to their immunization with nirsevimab (immunized and nonimmunized). We followed individuals until the earliest of an outcome—hospital emergency visits, hospital admission or pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission due to RSV-associated or all-causes bronchiolitis—death or the end of the study. We used the Kaplan-Meier estimator and fitted Cox regression models using a calendar time scale to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence interval (CI). Sensitivity analysis was performed through matching. Results: Among 15,341 infants, a dose of nirsevimab led to an adjusted HR for hospital admission, PICU admission and emergency visits due to RSV bronchiolitis of 0.26 (95% CI: 0.17–0.39), 0.15 (95% CI: 0.07–0.28) and 0.46 (95% CI: 0.23–0.90), respectively. For all-causes bronchiolitis, the former adjusted HRs were 0.45 (95% CI: 0.31–0.63), 0.23 (95% CI: 0.13–0.41) and 0.49 (95% CI: 0.35–0.68), respectively. Conclusions: Nirsevimab was associated with reductions of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 15,341 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free