Evidence Hub

Composition of plant-based diets and the incidence and prognosis of inflammatory bowel disease: a multinational retrospective cohort study

Jie Chen, Yuhao Sun, Lin-Tao Dan, Judith Wellens, Shuai Yuan, Hong Yang, T. Y. Tong, Amanda J. Cross et al.

The Lancet Regional Health - Europe, 2025

341,539 participants · 23 citations

Abstract

Summary Background Many currently proposed diets for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) focus on increasing plant-based foods, although a vegetarian diet can still contain products such as emulsifiers and refined grains that are believed to negatively impact IBD incidence and progression. To better inform dietary management in IBD, we investigated the association between plant-based diets and the incidence and complications of IBD. Methods We leveraged data from the UK Biobank (UKB, 2009–2022) including 187,888 participants free of IBD at baseline and the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC, 1991–2010) cohort including 341,539 individuals free of IBD across centres among Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and UK. Healthy and unhealthy diets were characterised using plant-based diet indexes (PDIs); in individual participants, these were based on the 24-h dietary recalls for UKB and food frequency questionnaires for EPIC. The primary outcome was the incidence of IBD; secondary outcomes evaluated endpoints of disease prognosis (IBD-related surgery, diabetes, cardiovascular diease, and all-cause mortality). Cox regression was applied to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Findings In the UKB (925 incident IBD, median follow-up 11.6 years, IQR 1.3 years), higher adherence to healthy PDI was associated with a lower IBD risk (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60–0.94), while higher alignment to an unhealthy PDI associated with an increased risk…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 341,539 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free