Evidence Hub

Existential distress in advanced cancer: A cohort study

R. Philipp, Charlotte Walbaum, Uwe Koch, K. Oechsle, Thies Daniels, F. Helmich, M. Horn, Johanna Junghans et al.

General Hospital Psychiatry, 2025

671 participants · 36 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Clinically significant existential distress may impair quality of life and communication about illness. We investigated the presence of existential distress in the form of demoralization, death anxiety, and dignity-related distress, and its co-occurrence with mental disorders in patients with advanced cancer.

METHODS

We conducted structured clinical interviews and administered self-report questionnaires to assess existential distress and mental disorders. We recruited patients with different Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage IV solid tumors from in- and outpatient oncology and palliative care settings.

RESULTS

A total of 671 patients completed assessments (55 % participation rate, 48 % female, primary tumor site: 28 % lung, 14 % prostate, 11 % breast). Clinically relevant levels of existential distress were present in 46.4 % (95 % CI, 41.7 % to 51.1 %), including demoralization, 12.5 % (95 % CI, 9.6 % to 15.9 %), death anxiety, 27.3 % (95 % CI, 23.2 % to 31.6 %), and dignity-related distress, 38.7 % (95 % CI, 34.2 % to 43.3 %). Frequent existential distress symptoms were sense of entrapment and fear of own and close others' suffering. Mental disorders occurred in 26.2 % (95 % CI, 22.2 % to 30.4 %), including major depression, 8.6 % (95 % CI, 6.2 % to 11.5 %), anxiety disorders, 8.4 % (95 % CI, 6.0 % to 11.3 %), and ICD-11-adjustment disorder, 10.5 % (95 % CI, 7.9 % to 13.7 %). Existential distress and mental disorders co-occurred in 20.0 % (95 %…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 671 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free