Evidence Hub

Burden of eosinophilic esophagitis in adult and adolescent patients: results from a real-world analysis

Alain M. Schoepfer, Stevie Olsen, James Siddall, Eilish McCann, Siddhesh Kamat, Kinga Borsos, Angela Khodzhayev, Amr Radwan et al.

Diseases of the Esophagus, 2025

412 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Real-world data on the impact of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in patients are limited. This study assessed clinical characteristics, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), symptoms, comorbidities, and quality of life (QoL) of EoE patients. METHODS: The multicountry cross-sectional survey, Adelphi EoE Disease Specific Programme™, collected physician and patient-reported data on clinical characteristics, HCRU, symptoms, comorbidities, and QOL of EoE patients with past/current proton pump inhibitor use and ongoing dysphagia-related symptoms (September to December 2020) at study entry. RESULTS: Physicians provided clinical characteristics, symptom, comorbidity, and HCRU data for 412 patients (12-17 years: 8%; ≥18 years: 92%); and 161 of these patients (12-17 years: 6%; ≥18 years: 94%) provided symptom and QOL data. Of the 412 patients, 67% were male, with a mean (SD) age of 37.0 (15.3) years. Overall, 74% of patients were currently being treated with corticosteroids (12-17 years: 88%; ≥18 years: 73%); 25% of patients had a history of esophageal dilations (12-17 years: 19%; ≥18 years: 26%); and 30% of patients had EoE-related emergency room visit (12-17 years: 31%; ≥18 years: 30%) in the last year. Among the 161 patients, heartburn (69%) was the most commonly reported symptom; the greatest negative impacts on QOL were reported for dysphagia-related anxiety, social activities involving food, and maintaining friendships (EoE Impact Questionnaire scores [1-5, low to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 412 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free