Evidence Hub

Suprabasal Blistering as a Diagnostic Pitfall in Bullous Pemphigoid: Histopathologic-Immunofluorescence Discordance Complicated by Sepsis

Saenz AV, Cazares M, Romero SG, Cardenas MA, de La O S, Bustillos AK

Cureus, 2026

Abstract

Bullous pemphigoid is the most common autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease, typically diagnosed through a combination of clinical features, histopathology, and direct immunofluorescence (DIF). However, histopathological findings can be misleading when re-epithelialization shifts the blister plane from subepidermal to suprabasal, mimicking pemphigus vulgaris. We present the case of a 58-year-old woman with type 2 diabetes mellitus, diabetic neuropathy, and a sacral pressure ulcer admitted with a three-week history of generalized tense bullae in a symmetric distribution across the trunk and extremities, with subsequent oral mucosal involvement. The disease was classified as severe bullous pemphigoid. Skin biopsy revealed a suprabasal blister with eosinophilic infiltrate, a pattern classically associated with pemphigus vulgaris; however, DIF demonstrated linear immunoglobulin G and complement C3c deposition at the dermoepidermal junction, confirming bullous pemphigoid and categorically ruling out pemphigus. Initial treatment with systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressants was complicated by septic shock secondary to a catheter-related bloodstream infection, hospital-acquired pneumonia, and urinary tract infection, requiring vasopressor support, adjustment of the immunosuppressive regimen, and antimicrobial escalation. The patient also developed progressive multifactorial anemia, sepsis-associated coagulopathy, and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Following…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free