Evidence Hub

Human cold pain: a randomized crossover trial

Resch FJ, Heber S, Shahi F, Zauner M, Ciotu CI, Gleiss A, Sator S, Fischer MJM

Pain, 2025

36 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Abstract: The mechanism causing cold pain in humans is unresolved. Animal data suggest a nonredundant contribution to cold pain for transient receptor potential channels TRPM8 and TRPA1 for detection and voltage-gated sodium channels Na V 1.7 and Na V 1.8 for conduction at these temperatures. We established an intradermal injection-based cold pain model, which allows pharmacologically addressing molecular targets at the site of cooling. Lidocaine, added to the injection solution as positive control, largely reduced cold-induced pain in 36 volunteers. The 4 mentioned molecular targets were blocked by antagonists in a double-blinded crossover trial. Pain induced by 3°C intradermal fluid was not reduced to a relevant extent by any of the 4 antagonists alone or by the quadruple combination. However, the temperature threshold for cold pain appeared shifted by the inhibition of TRPA1, TRPM8, and Na V 1.7 and to a lesser extent by Na V 1.8 inhibition, 4-fold inhibition decreased the threshold by 5.8°C. Further mechanisms contributing to human cold pain need to be considered.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 36 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free