Evidence Hub

Effects of nicotinamide supplementation in normal-tension glaucoma: a crossover placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial

Ahnul Ha, Young Kook Kim, C. Lee, Pete A. Williams, James E. Morgan, Young In Shin, Eunsol Kim, Myung-Kyung Kim et al.

British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2025

13 citations

Abstract

Background/Aims The neuroprotective effect of nicotinamide (NAM) supplementation has been demonstrated in both animal models and clinical trials. We conducted a trial to assess whether oral NAM improves retinal function in normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) participants receiving intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering therapy. Methods Fifty-three NTG participants (untreated IOP ≤18 mm Hg) were enrolled in a double-masked, placebo-controlled crossover randomised clinical trial. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either oral placebo or NAM, followed by crossover without a washout period. Each treatment was administered for 12 weeks (NAM/placebo 1 g/day for 6 weeks, then 2 g/day for the subsequent 6 weeks). Retinal function was evaluated using full-field electroretinography and visual field testing. Results After 12 weeks, the amplitude changes of the photopic negative response in peak-to-trough (PhNRPT) and the B-wave were significantly greater in the NAM group (3.121±3.968 and 2.112±3.220 μV, respectively) compared with the placebo group (0.996±4.190 and 0.305±3.279 μV, respectively; p=0.045 and p=0.032). PhNRPT improved beyond twice the 95% coefficient of variation in 29.0% of the NAM group and 19.3% of the placebo group. No significant intergroup differences were observed in changes in mean deviation, pattern SD or visual field index after 12 weeks. Conclusion Oral NAM supplementation in NTG participants induced functional improvement, as measured by PhNRPT and B-wave…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free