Evidence Hub

Low-Frequency Electrical Stimulation of the Auricular Branch of the Vagus Nerve in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Sofia Kruchinova, M. Gendugova, A. Namitokov, M. Sokolskaya, I. Gilevich, Z. Tatarintseva, M. Karibova, V. Danilov et al.

Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2025

110 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

Background: Despite the vast evidence of the beneficial effect of vagus nerve stimulation on the course of myocardial infarction confirmed in studies using animal models, the introduction of this method into actual clinical practice remains uncommon. Objective: The objective of our study was to evaluate the effect of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) on in-hospital and long-term outcomes for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Materials and Methods: A blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted. The participants were randomly split into two groups. The Active tVNS group was subjected to stimulation of the tragus containing the auricular branch of the vagus nerve. The Sham tVNS group underwent stimulation of the lobule. Stimulation was performed immediately on admission before the start of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Then, tVNS continued throughout the entire PCI procedure and 30 min after its completion. The primary endpoints were hospital mortality and 12-month mortality. The secondary endpoints were in-hospital and remote non-lethal cardiovascular events. The combined endpoint consisted of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs)—recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke/TIA, and overall mortality. Results: A total of 110 patients were randomized into the Active tVNS group (n = 55) and the Sham tVNS group (n = 55). The incidences of hospital mortality, cardiogenic shock, and AV block 3 were statistically…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 110 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free