Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of the oral PCSK9 inhibitor MK-0616: a phase 2b randomized controlled trial

C. Ballantyne, Puja Banka, G. Mendez, Raymundo Garcia, J. Rosenstock, A. Rodgers, Geraldine Mendizabal, Y. Mitchel et al.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2023

616 participants · 167 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

MK-0616 is an oral PCSK9 macrocyclic peptide inhibitor in development for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia.

OBJECTIVES

This Phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial (NCT05261126) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MK-0616 in participants with hypercholesterolemia.

METHODS

This study planned to include 375 adult participants with a wide range of ASCVD risk. Participants were assigned randomly (1:1:1:1:1 ratio) to MK-0616 (6, 12, 18, or 30 mg QD) or matching placebo. The primary endpoints included percent change from baseline in LDL-C at Week 8 and the proportion of participants with adverse events (AE) and study intervention discontinuations due to AEs; participants were monitored for AEs for an additional 8 weeks after the treatment period.

RESULTS

Of the 381 participants randomized, 49% were female, and median age was 62 years. Among 380 treated participants, all doses of MK-0616 demonstrated statistically significant (p<0.001) differences in LS mean % change in LDL-C from baseline to Week 8 vs. placebo: -41.2% (6 mg), -55.7% (12 mg), -59.1% (18 mg), and -60.9% (30 mg). AEs occurred in a similar proportion of participants in the MK-0616 arms (39.5% to 43.4%) as placebo (44.0%). Discontinuations due to AEs occurred in 2 or fewer participants in any treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

MK-0616 demonstrated statistically significant and robust, dose-dependent placebo-adjusted reductions in LDL-C at Week 8 of up to 60.9% from…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 616 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free