Evidence Hub

Time-restricted eating in early-stage Huntington’s disease: A 12-week interventional clinical trial protocol

Russell G. Wells, Lee E. Neilson, Andrew W. McHill, Amie L. Hiller

PLoS ONE, 2025

25 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Huntington’s disease (HD) is a devastating neurodegenerative disorder characterized by a variety of debilitating symptoms including abnormal motor control, cognitive impairment, and psychiatric disturbances. Despite significant efforts, efficacious treatments to alter the course of HD remain elusive, highlighting the need to explore new therapeutic strategies, including lifestyle changes that may delay the onset of symptoms and slow disease progression. Recent research indicates that time-restricted eating (TRE), a type of intermittent fasting where caloric intake is confined to a specific time window each day, may be beneficial in treating neurodegenerative diseases like HD. TRE has been found to enhance mitochondrial function, stimulate autophagy, lower oxidative stress, and improve cognitive performance. Although TRE has shown potential in HD animal models and non-HD populations, it has yet to be analyzed for safety, feasibility, and efficacy in persons with HD. Therefore, we propose a prospective interventional, open-label, single-arm, pilot study of 25 participants with late prodromal and early manifest HD to evaluate participant adherence to TRE diet – specifically, maintaining a 6-8-hour eating window every day for 12 weeks. Secondary measures will include pre- versus post-intervention assessment of body composition via bioelectrical impedance analysis, vital signs and safety labs, serum biomarkers of neurodegeneration, and standard HD behavioral, cognitive, and motor…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 25 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free