Evidence Hub

Polyethylene Glycol–Mediated Axonal Fusion Promotes Early Sensory Recovery after Digital Nerve Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Sriya V Nemani, Sara C. Chaker, Helen Ismail, Julia Yao, M. Chang, Hakmook Kang, Mihir J. Desai, Douglas R. Weikert et al.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2024

22 participants · 16 citations

Abstract

Background: Peripheral nerve repair is limited by Wallerian degeneration coupled with the slow and inconsistent rates of nerve regrowth. In more proximal injuries, delayed nerve regeneration can cause debilitating muscle atrophy. Topical application of polyethylene glycol (PEG) during neurorrhaphy facilitates the fusion of severed axonal membranes, immediately restoring action potentials across the coaptation site. In preclinical animal models, PEG fusion resulted in remarkable early functional recovery. Methods: This is the first randomized clinical trial comparing functional outcomes between PEG fusion and standard neurorrhaphy. Participants with digital nerve transections were followed up at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was assessed using the Medical Research Council Classification (MRCC) rating for sensory recovery at each time point. Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and static 2-point discrimination determined MRCC ratings. Postoperative quality of life was measured using the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. Results: Forty-eight transected digital nerves (25 control and 23 PEG) across 22 patients were analyzed. PEG-fused nerves demonstrated significantly higher MRCC scores at 2 weeks (OR, 16.95; 95% CI, 1.79 to 160.38; P = 0.008) and 1 month (OR, 13.40; 95% CI, 1.64 to 109.77; P = 0.009). Participants in the PEG cohort also had significantly higher average Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire scores at 2 weeks (Hodge g, 1.28;…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 22 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free