Evidence Hub

Antagonizing NRG1-ERBB4 signaling pathway with spironolactone for the treatment of schizophrenia: results of a randomized controlled drug repositioning clinical trial

Alkomiet Hasan, S. Leucht, Astrid Roeh, B. Langguth, Maximilian Hansbauer, T. Oviedo-Salcedo, Sophie-Kathrin Greiner, I. Papazova et al.

Communications Medicine, 2026

90 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

The (NRG1)-ERBB4 signaling pathway has been identified to be pathophysiologically meaningful for cognitive impairments in schizophrenia. The in the 1960s approved mineralocorticoid antagonist spironolactone has been shown to be effective to modulate (NRG1)-ERBB4 signaling in preclinical and animal models. Thus, a proof-of-concept drug repurposing trial in patients with schizophrenia was justified. We conducted a multi-site proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial. 90 patients with schizophrenia were randomized to a three-week trial of two different spironolactone dosages (100 mg or 200 mg) or placebo. The primary endpoint was predefined as change in working memory performance after three weeks of treatment. A naturalistic follow-up was performed nine weeks after the end of intervention. The trial was registered at the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry platform (http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=EUCTR2014-001968-35-DE). Despite large numerical improvements in working memory functions, particularly in the spironolactone 200 mg group, the pre-specified analyses do not demonstrate significant superiority of either intervention over placebo. However, post-hoc sensitivity analyses suggest a significant advantage of spironolactone for the primary endpoint. Safety measures show that both interventions are well tolerated. This finding suggests a potential positive effect of spironolactone on working memory in people with schizophrenia and the good…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 90 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free