Evidence Hub

Evaluation of the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of SM17 in healthy volunteers: results from pre-clinical models and a first-in-human, randomized, double blinded clinical trial

Guolin Xu, S. Paglialunga, Xuchen Qian, R. Ding, Kenneth Webster, A. V. van Haarst, C. Engel, C. Hui et al.

Frontiers in Immunology, 2024

53 participants · 13 citations

Abstract

Background Alarmins mediate type 2 T helper cell (Th2) inflammation and serve as upstream signaling elements in allergic inflammation and autoimmune responses. The alarmin interleukin (IL)-25 binds to a multi-domain receptor consisting of IL-17RA and IL-17RB subunits, resulting in the release of Th2 cytokines IL-4, IL-5, IL-9 and IL-13 to drive an inflammatory response. Therefore, the blockage of IL-17RB via SM17, a novel humanized monoclonal antibody, offers an attractive therapeutic target for Th2-mediated diseases, such as asthma. Methods Wild-type mice were stimulated with house dust mite (HDM) extracts for evaluation of SM17’s pre-clinical efficacy in allergic asthma. The safety, pharmacokinectics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity of intravenous (IV) doses of SM17 were assessed in a 2-part clinical study in healthy adult subjects. In Part A, 53 healthy participants were enrolled to receive a single IV dose of SM17 (2, 20, 70, 200, 400, 600, 1200 mg) or placebo. In Part B, 24 healthy subjects were enrolled to receive a single IV dose of SM17 every two weeks (Q2W; 200, 400, 600 mg) or placebo for a total of 3 doses. Results Animal studies demonstrated that SM17 significantly suppressed Th2 inflammation in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and infiltration of immune cells into the lungs. In the Phase I clinical study, no drug-related serious adverse events were observed. Total SM17 exposure increased by approximately 60- to 188-fold with a 60-fold increase in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 53 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free