Evidence Hub

Antiviral and immunomodulatory effect of zapnometinib in animal models and hospitalized COVID-19 patients

Yvonne Füll, Lara M. Schüssele, Hazem Hamza, Helen Hoffmann, Martin Bauer, Stephan Stenglein, O. Pötz, A. Steinhilber et al.

Frontiers in Immunology, 2025

19 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

Introduction In severe COVID-19, direct-acting antiviral drugs were not effective in hyperinflammatory stages and steroid treatment may weaken host immunity. The MEK inhibitor zapnometinib, as a host-targeting drug, has demonstrated promising efficacy against severe acute viral infections. Proof-of-concept for the innovative approach was presented in a clinical Phase 2 trial with hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Methods The antiviral and immunomodulatory potential of zapnometinib was investigated in samples obtained from COVID-19 patients enrolled in a Phase 2 clinical trial (RESPIRE), as well as in a SARS-CoV-2 Syrian hamster model, an acute lung injury mouse model, and in cell culture. The antiviral activity of zapnometinib was assessed using viral load reduction assays and RT-qPCR. Cytokines and chemokines were analyzed via ELISA and RT-qPCR. Alterations in T and B cells from COVID-19 patients were analyzed using flow cytometry. Biomarker analysis in hamster serum was conducted to monitor potential toxic effects. Results Zapnometinib reduced SARS-CoV-2 viral load in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, in the hamster model and in various highly pathogenic coronaviruses in vitro. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines decreased in COVID-19 patients, in a lung injury mouse model, and in vitro in primary human blood cells treated with zapnometinib. In the hamster model, zapnometinib alleviated SARS-CoV-2-mediated lung pathology. In patients with COVID-19, zapnometinib increased…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free