Evidence Hub

Effect of lithium on circadian activity level and flexibility in patients with bipolar disorder: results from the Oxford Lithium Trial

Ni Xu, Yan Yan, K. E. A. Saunders, J. Geddes, Michael Browning

EBioMedicine, 2025

8 citations

Abstract

Summary Background Disruption of circadian rest-activity is prevalent in patients with bipolar disorder (BD). Lithium's impact on circadian rhythms has been documented in cell lines, animal models, and pharmacogenomics studies in patients with BD. However, the causal relationship between such disruption and BD remains unclear. Methods We investigated the early effects of lithium on circadian rest-activity in an exploratory analysis of a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind six-week study on patients with BD. Participants were assigned to receive either lithium or a placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Circadian activity was monitored using actigraphy, and daily affect was assessed through ecological momentary assessment. A computational model was used to quantify different types of activity variability, and the impact of lithium on activity level, activity onset time and their variability were analysed using linear mixed models. Findings Of the thirty-five participants who began treatment, 19 received lithium and 16 received a placebo. Lithium significantly altered circadian rest-activity patterns, including reducing daytime activity levels (after 4 weeks, below as well: Cohen's d = −0.19, p = 0.002, linear mixed model, ibid.), advancing the onset of daytime activity (Cohen's d = −0.14, p = 0.018), and increasing the volatility of both daytime activity level (Cohen's d = 0.10, p = 0.002) and its onset time (Cohen's d = 0.13, p < 0.001), independent of affective symptoms changes.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free