Evidence Hub

Depression increases cancer mortality by 23–83%: a meta-analysis of 65 studies across five major cancer types

Z. Ungvari, M. Fekete, Annamária Buda, Andrea Lehoczki, J. Fekete, P. Varga, Anna Ungvari, B. Győrffy

GeroScience, 2025

46 citations

Abstract

Depression is a prevalent but often underrecognized comorbidity among cancer patients. Emerging evidence suggests that psychological distress may adversely impact cancer outcomes, but the magnitude of its effect on survival remains unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates the association between depression diagnosed after cancer diagnosis and cancer-specific and all-cause mortality across major cancer types. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify cohort studies examining the impact of depression on cancer mortality. Studies were included if they assessed clinically diagnosed depression or depressive symptoms using validated scales and reported hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality outcomes. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to pool HR estimates, with heterogeneity assessed via Cochran’s Q and I2 statistics. Funnel plots and Egger’s test were used to evaluate publication bias. A total of 65 cohort studies were included. Depression was associated with significantly increased cancer-specific mortality in colorectal cancer (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.47–2.28), breast cancer (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.13–1.34), lung cancer (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.36–1.86), and prostate cancer (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.36–2.23). When considering mixed cancer types, depression was linked to a 38% increased risk of cancer mortality (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.20–1.60). Significant heterogeneity was observed across studies (I2 range 56–98%), suggesting…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free