Evidence Hub

Improving outcomes of atrial fibrillation ablation by integrated personalized lifestyle interventions: a randomized controlled trial

J. Vermeer, T. Vinck-de Greef, M. van den Broek, B. de Louw, G. V. van Steenbergen, D. van Veghel, L. Dekker

European Heart Journal, 2025

145 participants · 15 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with various lifestyle risk factors. Their presence negatively affects AF catheter ablation outcomes. This study evaluates the efficacy of a nurse-led, integrated lifestyle programme on ablation outcomes.

METHODS

POP-AF is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial involving patients referred for their first AF ablation. Patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to standard pre-ablation counselling by the treating electrophysiologist, or a nurse-led integrated lifestyle clinic, including a home sleep apnea test, weight reduction, alcohol reduction, smoking cessation, and optimal hypertension and hypercholesterolemia treatment before undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The primary endpoint was a composite of hospitalizations for repeat ablations and direct current cardioversions in an event-rate analysis up to 12 months after pulsed-field PVI.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients participated in the trial; 70 patients were assigned to the control group, and 75 patients were assigned to the integrated lifestyle treatment (ILT) group. The median age of patients was 62 years, 26% were women, and 59% had persistent AF. Median ILT duration was 5 months. The primary endpoint occurred 52 times (492/1000 patient-years) in the control group and 25 times (240/1000 patient-years) in the ILT group (incidence relative risk [RR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.78, P=0.004). The rates of repeat ablations (RR 0.43, 95% CI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 145 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free