Evidence Hub

Phosphatidylethanol and self-reported alcohol intake to subclassify in individuals at risk of steatotic liver disease: an analysis of data from a prospective cohort study

Nikolaj Torp, K. Bech, H. Schnefeld, Stine Johansen, C. D. Hansen, Georg Semmler, Javier Vega Benjumea, K. Lindvig et al.

The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2025

2,042 participants · 32 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Phosphatidylethanol is a direct biomarker of alcohol consumption within the past 1-4 weeks, making it a potential tool in the subclassification of patients with steatotic liver disease. However, the clinical utility of phosphatidylethanol among individuals at risk of steatotic liver disease remains to be established. We aimed to investigate the correlation between phosphatidylethanol and self-reported alcohol intake among individuals at risk of steatotic liver disease due to excessive alcohol consumption or metabolic dysfunction.

METHODS

We used data from a single-centre, prospective study that was conducted at Odense University Hospital (Odense, Denmark), designed to investigate use of non-invasive markers for screening for fibrosis. We analysed data for at-risk participants aged 30-75 years from the general population with a history of ongoing or previous excessive alcohol use (alcohol group) or metabolic dysfunction without excessive alcohol use (metabolic group). Participants self-reported past 1-week and 3-month average alcohol intake, and completed the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification-Consumption (AUDIT-C) questionnaire. The presence of hepatic steatosis (controlled attenuation parameter ≥248 dB/m), cardiometabolic risk factors and past 3-month alcohol intake were used to classify participants as having metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD; <20 g [females] or <30 g [males] per day), metabolic and alcohol-related liver disease…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 2,042 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free