Evidence Hub

Predictive value of circulating inflammatory biomarkers for early-onset post-stroke cognitive impairment: a prospective cohort study

Weiquan Huang, Libin Liao, Qian Liu, Rongchao Ma, Wentong Hu, Yuan Dai, Lu-na Wang, Du-Juan Sha

Frontiers in Neurology, 2025

146 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

Introduction Stroke ranks as the second leading cause of mortality and the third leading cause of disability globally. Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is a prevalent complication following acute ischemic stroke, imposing substantial burdens on patients, families, and society. This study aimed to explore the potential of circulating immune-inflammatory markers as predictors of PSCI. Methods Conducted as a prospective observational cohort study from June 2023 to August 2024 at the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, it included patients experiencing their first acute ischemic stroke within 72 h of symptom onset. Cognitive assessments were conducted 7 to 10 days post-stroke using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), with scores below 23 indicating PSCI. Results A total of 146 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were recruited, with 71 patients exhibiting PSCI during the acute phase of stroke. Compared to patients in the post-stroke no cognitive impairment (PSNCI) group, those with PSCI demonstrated significantly elevated peripheral blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), globulin-to-lymphocyte ratio (GLR), and C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR), while the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) was notably reduced (all p < 0.05). Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified GLR as independently associated with PSCI. After adjusting for common clinical variables, the odds ratio (OR) for the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 146 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free