A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lansoprazole 30 mg QD and Naproxen 500 mg BID Versus Celecoxib 200 mg QD in Risk Reduction of Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory-Associated Ulcers in Osteoarthritis Subjects Taking Low Dose Aspirin
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare the gastroduodenal ulceration rate, gastrointestinal complication rate and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated dyspepsia between lansoprazole, naproxen and celecoxib, taken once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID), in participants with osteoarthritis taking low dose aspirin.
Conditions: Osteoarthritis, Peptic Ulcer.
Primary outcome: Gastroduodenal ulcers at final visit.
Enrollment: 1045 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 1,045 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Improving sleep quality leads to better mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study
- A new aging measure captures morbidity and mortality risk across diverse subpopulations from NHANES IV: A cohort study
- Fruit, vegetable, and legume intake, and cardiovascular disease and deaths in 18 countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study
- Are noise and air pollution related to the incidence of dementia? A cohort study in London, England
- Long COVID symptoms and duration in SARS-CoV-2 positive children — a nationwide cohort study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.