Evidence Hub

Tegoprazan Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors for Erosive Esophagitis: A Meta-Analysis of Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trials

Bhatti MI, Safiullah M, Ijaz A, Mehmood Q, Shahid IF, Shahriar Z

JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025

766 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remain the standard treatment option for erosive esophagitis (EE) but have notable limitations due to side effects associated with long‐term use. Tegoprazan, a novel potassium‐competitive acid suppressant (P‐CAB), may provide an alternative treatment option. In this study, we aim to evaluate the healing rates of EE using tegoprazan versus PPIs, along with their respective safety profiles. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to March 2025. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Pooled estimates were calculated using random‐effects models in Review Manager 5.4. Results Three RCTs encompassing a total of 766 patients were included in the analysis. Tegoprazan demonstrated comparable healing rates to PPIs at both 4 weeks (risk ratio [RR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.99–1.11; p = 0.12) and 8 weeks (RR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.98–1.06; p = 0.35). Subgroup analyses by dose (50 and 100 mg) showed no significant differences. While overall adverse event rates were similar between groups, the incidence of headache was numerically lower in the tegoprazan group (1.3% vs. 4.2%; RR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.08–2.00; p = 0.26), though this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion Tegoprazan shows comparable efficacy and safety to standard PPIs for treating EE. While healing rates were slightly higher, particularly with the 100 mg dose, the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 766 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free