Evidence Hub

Tegoprazan vs. proton pump inhibitors for erosive esophagitis: a superior alternative or just another option? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Nayyer MA, Rasool H, Murtaza H, Safdar MR, Khan SM, Khalid S, Umer M

European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2025

658 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, has emerged as a potential alternative to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the treatment of erosive esophagitis (EE), especially in light of long-term safety concerns associated with PPIs. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan compared to PPIs in patients with EE. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, including three randomized controlled trials with a total of 658 patients diagnosed with EE. The primary outcomes were cumulative endoscopic healing rates across 4-8 weeks and at 4 and 8 weeks, while secondary outcomes included any adverse events, drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs). Tegoprazan demonstrated noninferior healing rates at 4 weeks [relative risk (RR) = 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96-1.16; P = 0.28; I ² = 51%] and 8 weeks (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.96-1.06; P = 0.73; I ² = 0%) compared to PPIs. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall incidence of adverse events or SAEs (RR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.92-1.53; P = 0.19; I ² = 24%). However, a significantly higher rate of drug-related TEAEs was observed in the tegoprazan group (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.03-1.48; P = 0.02; I ² = 0%). In conclusion, tegoprazan is an effective treatment option for EE, with comparable efficacy to PPIs, though further studies are…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 658 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free