Evidence Hub

Comparator Choice in Helicobacter pylori Eradication: Tegoprazan-Amoxicillin Dual Therapy Versus an Optimized Bismuth-Containing Quadruple Therapy in a Randomized Trial and Meta-Analysis

Duan M, Kong Q, Wang H, Wu X, Zeng S, Ju K, Yang X, Li Y et al.

International journal of antimicrobial agents, 2026

258 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Given the variable eradication efficacy of bismuth-containing quadruple therapies (BcQT), comparator choice is critical in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication. This study compared the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy (TADT) versus esomeprazole-amoxicillin-tetracycline bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (EBQT) as first-line treatment.

METHODS

In this non-inferiority RCT conducted at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from March 2023 to January 2024, treatment-naïve H. pylori-infected patients were randomized to receive TADT or EBQT for 14 days. The primary outcome was eradication rate in the intention-to-treat (ITT), modified ITT (mITT), and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Secondary outcomes were adverse events and compliance. A meta-analysis of RCTs comparing TADT with BcQT for first-line eradication was also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 258 patients were randomized. Eradication rates were 82.95% vs 90.70% (P = 0.066) in ITT, 84.25% vs 91.41% (P = 0.080) in mITT, and 89.17% vs 95.80% (P = 0.052) in PP analysis for TADT and EBQT, respectively. Although eradication rates were comparable, TADT failed to demonstrate non-inferiority to EBQT. Adverse events (20.16% vs 26.36%, P = 0.238), and compliance (96.12% vs 95.35%, P = 0.758) were similar. Seven groups were included in the meta-analysis. In the ITT subgroup analysis by antibiotic combination, TADT showed a significantly lower…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 258 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free