Evidence Hub

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker- and Proton Pump Inhibitor-Based Bismuth Quadruple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Network Meta-Analysis

Taufiqqurrachman I, Syam AF, Maulahela H, Abdullah M, Miftahussurur M, Yamaoka Y

Gastro hep advances, 2025

2,222 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Background and aims: The eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) reduces the incidence of gastric cancer. However, the efficacy of the widely used triple therapy for eradicating H. pylori has progressively reduced. This may have resulted from the increase in clarithromycin resistance in recent years. Recent guidelines recommend the use of bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) as first-line eradication therapy for H. pylori infection in areas with high (>15%) or unknown clarithromycin resistance. However, the eradication rates of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based BQT remain below the required standard. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the use of novel acid suppressant (potassium-competitive acid blocker [P-CAB])-based BQT compared with PPI-based BQT for H. pylori eradication.

Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, and Scopus databases, along with randomized controlled trials comparing P-CAB-based and PPI-based BQT for H. pylori eradication.

Results: Intention-to-treat analysis showed a pooled risk ratio (RR) of 1.04 (95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.06, I2 = 0) and per-protocol set analysis yielded an RR of 1.04 (95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.07, I2 = 0), favoring P-CAB-based BQT with minimal heterogeneity. Seven studies (n = 2222) reported no significant difference in adverse events (RR: 1.06 [0.99-1.14, I2 = 30.6%]).

Conclusion: Meta-analysis showed the P-CAB-based BQT had slightly higher…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,222 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free