Evidence Hub

Comparative Analysis of High-Dose Dual Therapies in First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication: An Inverse Probability of Treatment-Weighted Multicenter Study

Kong Q, Wang B, Zhou B, Lu H, Yan T, Han Y, Ding Y, Li P et al.

The Journal of infectious diseases, 2026

1,665 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-dose dual therapy (HDDT) is a promising first-line treatment option for Helicobacter pylori infection. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different HDDT regimens.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included data from 10 centers between January 2022 and January 2025. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted (IPTW) adjustment was used to address the imbalance in variables across groups. The outcomes included the eradication rate, adverse events and adherence.

RESULTS

A total of 1,665 patients were included, with a full analysis set (FAS) eradication rate of 88.6% and a per-protocol (PP) eradication rate of 89.5% for HDDT. After IPTW adjustment, the eradication rate of vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) 14-day based on FAS analysis was 95.1%, which was significantly higher than VA-10 day (88.7%) (P = 0.001), esomeprazole-amoxicillin (EA) (85.1%) (P < 0.001), and tegoprazan-amoxicillin (TA) (87.3%) (P < 0.001). The incidence of adverse events for VA-14 was 8.1%, which was comparable to VA-10 (11.1%) but lower than TA (14.4%) and EA (15.3%) (P = 0.002). Adherence showed no significant difference across groups. High body surface area (BSA) (≥1.80 m²) (OR 1.594, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.018-2.495, P = 0.041), poor adherence (OR 4.975, 95% CI, 2.753-8.992, P < 0.001), and non-VA-14 treatment regimen were independent risk factors for eradication failure. Factors varied across regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

HDDT, particularly VA-14, is a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,665 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free