Evidence Hub

A randomized noninferiority trial comparing tegoprazan triple therapy and bismuth quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication

Qingjie Zhou, Jun-Yan Du, Changbo Sun, Zhen Luo, Haifan Yan, Xia Chen, Jia-Xin Liu, Hanting Ye et al.

Scientific Reports, 2026

Abstract

Rising antibiotic resistance has compromised the efficacy of standard

Helicobacter pylori

(

H. pylori

) eradication regimens. This multicenter trial aimed to evaluate whether a simplified tegoprazan-based triple therapy (TAD) is non-inferior to tegoprazan-based bismuth quadruple therapy (TADB) in a high-resistance setting. In this randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial conducted across nine centers in China, 274 treatment-naïve patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either Group TAD (tegoprazan 50 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, doxycycline 100 mg) or Group TADB (TAD plus bismuth potassium citrate 600 mg) twice daily for 14 days. In the per-protocol (PP) analysis, eradication rates were 91.7% (111/121) for Group TAD and 96.0% (120/125) for Group TADB. Using the Newcombe score method against a pre-specified non-inferiority margin of -10%, the difference in per-protocol eradication rates was − 4.3% (95% CI: -9.8% to 2.0%), successfully establishing statistical non-inferiority. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis yielded consistent results (83.5% vs. 85.1%,

P

= 0.835). Group TAD demonstrated a significantly superior safety profile (22.6% vs. 46.1% AEs,

P

< 0.001). A simplified tegoprazan-based triple therapy is non-inferior to its bismuth-containing counterpart, offering high efficacy with a significantly improved safety profile and reduced pill burden. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500102215. Registered 2025-05-12 (Retrospectively registered).

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free