Evidence Hub

Comparing Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker And Proton Pump Inhibitor For Gastroeshopageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Ida Bagus Putra Narendra

Jurnal Inovasi Global, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Clinical management is typically used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Assessed individuals with a range of clinical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) to determine the safety and effectiveness of potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs). By examining core databases, studies comparing PCABs and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in clinical gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and PPI-resistant GERD were identified. In nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the first care of GERD, the risk ratio for healing with PCABs versus PPIs was 1.09 (95% CI, 1.04-1.13) at 2 weeks and 1.03 (95% CI, 1.00-1.07) after 8 weeks, respectively. While 86.3% of PPI-resistant GERD patients reported an improvement in symptom frequency, 90.7% of patients showed improvement in five observational trials. When it comes to the initial and ongoing treatment of GERD, especially severe GERD, PCABs are more effective and have a quicker therapeutic effect than PPIs. However, PCABs might be a different kind of treatment for GERD and GERD that is resistant to PPIs.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free