Evidence Hub

Therapist-Guided, Internet-Delivered Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Adolescents With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

F. Lenhard, E. Andersson, D. Mataix-Cols, C. Rück, S. Vigerland, J. Högström, Maria Hillborg, Gustaf Brander et al.

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2017

139 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is the first-line treatment for young people with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but most patients do not have access to this treatment. Thus, innovative ways to increase the accessibility of CBT are needed. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of therapist-guided internet-based CBT (ICBT) for adolescents with OCD.

METHOD

Sixty-seven adolescents (12-17 years old) with OCD were randomly assigned to a 12-week clinician- and parent-supported ICBT program (BiP OCD) or a waitlist condition. The primary outcome was the Children Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) administered by blinded assessors before and after the intervention. All patients were followed up 3 months after the intervention.

RESULTS

In intention-to-treat analyses, BiP OCD was superior to waitlist on the CY-BOCS (time-by-group interaction, B = -4.53, z = -3.74, p < .001; Cohen's d = 0.69; 95% CI 0.19-1.18) and on most secondary outcome measurements. Patients randomized to BiP OCD also showed further improvement from post-treatment to 3-month follow-up, with a within-group pretreatment to follow-up effect size (Cohen's d) equal to 1.68 (95% CI 1.00-2.36). Patient satisfaction with BiP OCD was high. There were no relevant adverse events. Average clinician support time was 17.5 minutes per patient per week.

CONCLUSION

Therapist-guided ICBT is a promising low-intensity intervention for adolescents with OCD and has the potential to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free