Evidence Hub

From seven combination hypotheses to one testable interaction: a gated agentic AI–QSP workflow applied to healthy-ageing interventions

Goryanin I, Damms B, Goryanin IV

2026

356 participants

Abstract

Large language model (LLM) agents can propose combination therapies and construct supporting mechanistic models far quicker than either can be verified. To address this gap, we built a gated agentic AI–quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) workflow where no hypothesis reaches a report until it clears strict hurdles for precedent, evidence, structural integrity, and release. We applied this pipeline end to end to healthy-ageing interventions. It began with a 34-state model calibrated on clinical trial data for semaglutide and metformin. Locked and evaluated against an independent post hoc DNA-methylation trial, the model captured the direction of change across all 9 organ and system clocks, but the magnitude was far too small: it predicted about −0.14 years per year where −1.6 to −5.0 were observed, halting tier promotion. The workflow then generated seven nutritional combination hypotheses (H1–H7) with 48 new parameters encoded in SBML. Identifiability analysis showed that 37 of these were completely unconstrained by available data. Trimming the model down to its lead pairing—a food-derived bioactive (Agent A) plus a single-strain probiotic (Agent B)—left six identifiable parameters and locked the uncalibrated interaction term at zero. From this reduced model, we derived an 84-day $2 \times 2$ factorial trial with a 28-day washout, requiring 356 participants for 80% power at an interaction ratio of 0.75. A 9,000-person virtual trial confirmed the design (80.5% power), but…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free