Evidence Hub

Bevacizumab Monotherapy Reduces Radiation-induced Brain Necrosis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Yong-Teng Xu, Xiaoming Rong, Weihan Hu, Xiao-Long Huang, Yi Li, D. Zheng, Zhaoxi Cai, Z. Zuo et al.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2018

121 participants · 106 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

Studies have shown that addition of bevacizumab to corticosteroids improves outcome against radiation-induced brain necrosis (RN). Here, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of bevacizumab monotherapy on RN in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this multicenter open-label study, patients with RN were randomly assigned (1:1) into a bevacizumab group (5 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks, for 4 cycles) or a corticosteroid group (methylprednisolone 500 mg/day intravenously for 3 consecutive days and then gradually tapered, followed by 10 mg/day oral prednisone, for 2 months in total). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed pre- and post-treatment to define the radiographic response. The primary outcome was a 2-month response rate as determined by MRI and clinical symptoms. All of the patients were followed up with for 6 months. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01621880).

RESULTS

Of 121 patients screened, 112 patients met the entry criteria. Thirty-eight (65.5%) patients in the bevacizumab group showed response, which was significantly higher than that in the corticosteroid group (65.5% vs 31.5%, P < .001). The mean percentage decrease in RN volume seen on T1 post-gadolinium and T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI was 25.5% and 51.8%, respectively, in the bevacizumab group, versus 5.0% and 19.3%, respectively, in the corticosteroid group. Moreover, 36 patients (62.1%) on…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 121 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free