NN1250-3579: A 52-week Randomised, Controlled, Open Label, Multicentre, Multinational Treat-to-target Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of SIBA and Insulin Glargine, Both Injected Once Daily in Combination With Oral Anti-diabetic Drugs (OAD), in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Currently Treated With OAD(s) and Qualifying for More Intensified Treatment / NN1250-3643: An Extension Trial to NN1250-3579 Comparing Safety and Efficacy of NN1250 Plus OAD(s) With Insulin Glargine Plus OAD(s) in Type 2 Diabetes (BEGIN™: Once Long)
Abstract
This trial is conducted in Europe and the United States of America (USA). The aim of this trial is to compare NN1250 (insulin degludec (IDeg)) with insulin glargine (IGlar) in subjects with type 2 diabetes never treated with insulin followed by the extension trial investigating the long-term safety and tolerability in terms of comparing NN1250 with insulin glargine in subjects with type 2 diabetes.
All oral anti-diabetic drug (OAD) treatment will be discontinued when trial participant enters the main trial (NN1250-3579) with the exception of metformin and dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitor treatment (only in countries where DPP-IV inhibitor treatment is approved for combination treatment together with insulin, otherwise DPP-IV inhibitor treatment is also discontinued). Subjects who consent to participate in the extension trial will continue the treatment (NN1250 or insulin glargine + oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs)) to which they were randomly allocated in the 52 week main trial.
The main period is registered internally at Novo Nordisk as NN1250-3579 while the extension period is registered as NN1250-3643.
Conditions: Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.
Primary outcome: Main Trial (Primary Endpoint): Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) After 52 Weeks of Treatment; Extension Trial (Primary Endpoint): Rate of Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes; Extension Trial (Primary Endpoint): Rate of Nocturnal Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes; Extension Trial (Primary…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 1,030 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Metformin as an adjuvant in breast cancer treatment
- Metformin Lysosomal Targeting: A Novel Aspect to Be Investigated for Metformin Repurposing in Neurodegenerative Diseases?
- Aberrant HSF1 signaling activation underlies metformin amelioration of myocardial infarction in mice
- Metformin induces ZFP36 by mTORC1 inhibition in cervical cancer-derived cell lines
- Protein Interaction Network for Identifying Vascular Response of Metformin (Oral Antidiabetic)
- Preventing Long COVID With Metformin
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.