Evidence Hub

A 16-week, Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Nateglinide vs. Placebo in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Are Inadequately Controlled With Basal Insulin Glargine in Combination With Metformin and/or Thiazolidinedione (Pioglitazone or Rosiglitazone)

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2007

28 participants

Abstract

This study will assess the safety and efficacy of adding nateglinide to treatment with basal insulin glargine, metformin and/or thiazolidinedione (pioglitazone or rosiglitazone), for patients with type 2 diabetes who are not achieving glycemic control with glargine, metformin and/or thiazolidinedione only.

Conditions: Type 2 Diabetes.

Primary outcome: Change from baseline in hemoglobin (Hb)_A1c.

Enrollment: 28 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 28 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free