Evidence Hub

Long-term metabolic consequences of in-utero gestational diabetes exposure and maternal treatment interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Wu Y, Shen K, Guo H, Wang H

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026

9 participants

Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects 14-17% of pregnancies globally, imposing long-term public health burdens beyond pregnancy. Maternal hyperglycaemia increases offspring risk of metabolic disorders through epigenetic, hormonal and developmental programming. Growing evidence connects prenatal GDM exposure to childhood and adult metabolic diseases, yet the consistency and magnitude of these associations across different metabolic conditions remains unclear.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL and Embase. Eligible studies included observational cohorts exploring associations between in-utero GDM exposure and offspring metabolic outcomes, and RCTs assessing maternal antenatal interventions. Bias risk was evaluated with Cochrane RoB 2 (for RCTs) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) (for observational studies). Separate outcome-based pooled analyses were conducted, given the distinct clinical questions addressed by the two study designs. All meta-analyses used the random-effects inverse-variance model. Heterogeneity was assessed via I² and Cochran's Q statistic, and Egger's linear regression test was used to detect publication bias.

Results: Sixteen studies (n=9 RCTs, n=7 observational cohorts) involving diverse populations across 11 countries were included. In observational cohorts, GDM-exposed offspring showed higher BMI (MD = 1.42 kg/m2, 95% CI: 0.94-1.89) and greater estimates for overweight/obesity in adulthood (OR = 2.09, 95% CI:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 9 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free