Evidence Hub

Strengthening gestational diabetes mellitus prevention, diagnosis, and care in Africa: evidence and policy priorities from a systematic review, meta-analysis, and bibliometric analysis

Simon BA, Chauke L, Govender N, Kalinda C, Akpa-Inyang F, Thandar Y

Frontiers in public health, 2026

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an increasing public health challenge in Africa, contributing substantially to maternal and neonatal morbidity. Evidence from our systematic review, meta-analysis, and bibliometric analysis shows that inconsistent screening practices, reliance on selective rather than universal testing, and limited health system capacity contribute to underdiagnosis and poor pregnancy outcomes. GDM is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal complications and increases the long-term risk of type-2 diabetes for mothers and offspring. Our bibliometric findings reveal uneven research capacity, limited regional collaboration, and evidence gaps across Africa. We propose five policy priorities: standardising GDM screening, strengthening prevention, expanding access to diagnostics and treatment, improving workforce capacity and follow-up, and increasing investment in African-led research to improve maternal health and reduce the intergenerational burden of diabetes.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free