Evidence Hub

Bioequivalence studies with metformin: comparability of reference tablets from different origins

Vlahov V, Thyroff-Friesinger U, Koytchev R, Bakracheva N, Gatchev E

International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2005

24 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The choice of an appropriate reference product is still a problem within the European Union. When no direct comparisons between originator products in different countries are available, registration authorities are sometimes only prepared to grant registration for a generic product on the basis of a comparison with the originator product in the respective country. The aim of the investigation was therefore to evaluate the bioequivalence of reference products from different origins in two different bioequivalence trials with the same test drug.

METHODS: Two separate bioequivalence trials were performed involving the oral administration of one test and two reference products containing 500 mg metformin. Both studies had a randomized, open, single-dose, three-period crossover design and were carried out in 24 healthy volunteers. The reference products in the first trial were Glucophage mite (Germany) and Diabex (Australia). In the second trial the reference drugs were Glucophage mite (France) and Glucophage mite (Switzerland). The results of each trial were analyzed regarding the bioequivalence of the respective reference drugs.

FINDINGS: The reference drugs in each of both trials were bioequivalent: the 90% confidence intervals for both AUC(0-tlast) and C(max) were entirely within the acceptance range for bio-equivalence trials (0.80 - 1.25 for both parameters).

INTERPRETATION: In the case of metformin, the reference products available in the countries examined…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 24 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free