Evidence Hub

Metformin toxicity: a report of 204 cases from Iran

Shadnia S, Barzi F, Askari A, Hassanian-Moghaddam H, Zamani N, Ebrahimian K

Current drug safety, 2013

204 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of metformin-associated lactic acidosis in our metformin-intoxicated patients, the general approach for their management, and determine the frequency of hypoglycemia and outcome in these patients. We also wanted to see if there was a significant difference in the course and outcome of metformin poisoning between our patients and those reported in the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Files of all patients diagnosed with metformin toxicity were retrospectively evaluated. A purposemade questionnaire containing the patients' demographic data, vital signs and lab tests on presentation, time of development of hypoglycemia and metabolic acidosis (if any), treatment modalities performed for the patients and their indications, and the patients' outcomes was filled. The patients were evaluated in total and then assigned into two groups of metformin alone (group 1) and multi-drug toxicity including metformin (group 2) and were compared.

RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were reviewed. Fifty-five (26.9%) were in group 1 and 149 (73.1%) were in group 2. Sixteen and 52 patients in groups 1 and 2 had acidosis. Dialysis was performed in only four patients, all of whom belonged to group 1 (P = 0.005). They were all dialyzed only once. Two patients (1%) died both of whom were in group 2. Groups 1 and 2 were insignificantly different in all characteristics except for their aspartate transaminase and creatine phosphokinase. Almost…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 204 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free