Evidence Hub

The Wolfram syndrome: diabetes mellitus, hypacusis, optic atrophy and short stature in STH deficiency

Hofmann M, Boehmer H, Zumbach M, Borcea V, Grauer A, Kasperk C, Heilmann P, Ziegler R et al.

Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 1997

Abstract

HISTORY AND CLINICAL FINDINGS: A 43-year-old man was known for 3 years to have diabetes mellitus. For 2 months before admission he had symptoms of hyperglycaemia with polyuria, polydipsia, weight loss, as well as impairment of vision and declining fitness. In addition to bilateral deafness he was clearly of normally proportioned short stature (150 cm).

INVESTIGATIONS: The levels of blood sugar (221 mg/dl), HbA1c(10.2%), triglycerides (496 mg/dl) and cholesterol (323 mg/dl) were raised, while the concentration of somatotropic hormone was diminished, both before and after arginine administration. Fundoscopy revealed concentric diminution of the visual fields with left amblyopia. Visual evoked potentials and colour sense testing revealed bilateral optical atrophy, and the audiogram demonstrated deafness. These findings provided the diagnosis of Wolfram syndrome, namely insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, deafness, optical atrophy and small stature with somatotropic hormone deficiency.

TREATMENT AND COURSE: On insulin treatment the metabolic state became normal (HbA1c 7.5%, normal lipid profile). It was decided that the deficiency in somatotropic hormone regulation did not require treatment.

CONCLUSION: Cardinal symptoms of the autosomally recessive Wolfram syndrome are insulin-dependent diabetes and optic nerve atrophy. Several types of hormonal abnormalities are associated with it, including a deficiency in the somatotropic axis. To obtain early and adequate hormonal…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free